Imagine a disposable tableware ad that doesn’t
just blend into the TV ether but crashes into your living room like the life of the party. Origin’s CTV campaign for this big-name brand turned viewers into buyers, with the help of NCSolutions’ precision targeting that honed in on new, lapsed, and loyal fans alike. Origin's dynamic, QR-enabled 'Slingshot' ads hit the mark, delivering an 11.77% sales lift – miles ahead of
industry averages. This isn't your run-of-the-mill brand awareness play; it’s high-tech handshakes turning into high-dollar ROAS, proving that with Origin, the big screen is big business. READ THIS CASE STUDY NOW
Sprinkling Fairy Dust on CTV Ads: When Artificial Intelligence Meets Artificial Results
Connected TV (CTV) advertising was hyped as the marketer’s latest shiny toy—a seamless fusion of creativity and data-driven precision, all orchestrated by the ever-mystical artificial intelligence (AI). The pitch? Hyper-targeted ads that not only know what you want but also when you want it, blending so smoothly into your favorite shows that you’d
swear they were part of the plot. The reality? It’s more like a badly scripted sitcom where the punchlines fall flat and the guest stars are utterly forgettable. The ACR Fiasco: When AI Can't Read the RoomAutomatic Content Recognition (ACR) was touted as the holy grail of contextual advertising. The promise was simple: AI would read the room, detect the emotional tone of your
current binge-watch, and serve up an ad that’s not just relevant but contextually flawless. Imagine watching a spine-chilling episode of The Walking Dead and getting interrupted by an ad for knitting needles instead of, say, zombie repellant. Sounds absurd? Well, that’s where ACR often lands.
Yan Liu, CEO and Co-founder at TVision, doesn’t sugarcoat it: “AI is more about efficiency at this point, especially on some tasks you typically outsource. I think it will create more spam, MFA websites, and better creative for DR ads. AI is not good at linking multiple tasks yet. So I don't think it can add tons to quality of execution or creative.” He’s right. Most ACR systems can’t quite grasp the subtleties of human
emotion. They recognize the genre but not the mood shifts that dictate what type of ad should follow. So instead of a seamless transition, advertisers end up with mismatched jingles that make viewers want to change the channel faster than you can say “ROI.” Programmatic Buying: Precision or Pricey Guesswork?Programmatic ad buying on CTV was supposed to be the sharpshooter’s dream—AI analyzing real-time data to hit the exact target with surgical precision.
In theory, sounds like a marketer’s nirvana. In reality, it’s more like throwing darts blindfolded and hoping one lands in the right sector. Shared devices, fragmented data, and inflated CPMs (cost per thousand impressions) mean that “precision targeting” often misses the mark. You’re paying top dollar to reach your ideal demographic, only to have your ads shown to someone’s grandma binge-watching Golden Girls.
David Nyurenberg, founder of Rain the Growth Agency, cuts through the nonsense: “AI has fundamentally changed how we approach CTV, allowing us to score each impression based on its likelihood of achieving the outcomes we need.” While this sounds revolutionary, it’s essentially just a fancy way of saying, “We’re
making educated guesses with more data.” And let’s face it, even educated guesses can be wildly off when you’re dealing with the chaos of CTV. Shoppable Ads: Novelty Over FunctionalityShoppable ads were pitched as the future of CTV—ads so interactive that you could buy products without ever leaving your couch. Hulu and Roku have toyed with features like QR codes and product carousels, but let’s be real: navigating a purchase with a remote is about as
enjoyable as trying to text with oven mitts on. Most viewers would rather swipe on their phones or click through on their laptops. Shoppable CTV ads remain more of a novelty than a mainstream solution, leaving advertisers scratching their heads and consumers frustrated. Take, for example, Hulu’s attempt to integrate clickable product carousels during prime-time shows. The idea was brilliant on paper—seamlessly blend commerce with entertainment, allowing viewers to
instantly purchase the stylish jacket their favorite character just donned. In practice, though, the execution falls flat. Viewers are left fumbling with their remotes, trying to select tiny QR codes or navigate awkward drop-down menus while half-watching an intense drama. As Yan Liu, CEO of TVision, bluntly puts it, “AI isn’t good at linking multiple tasks yet. So I don't think it can add tons to quality of execution or creative.” The disconnect between the innovative concept and the clunky
user experience is glaringly obvious, making shoppable ads feel more like a gimmick than a game-changer. Moreover, the user behavior simply isn’t aligning with these experimental ad formats. While the promise is to turn passive viewers into active shoppers, the reality is that most people prefer the convenience of using their smartphones or laptops for purchases. Andrew King, GM and Product Lead at TripleLift, observes, “We’re already witnessing
applications—smarter ad placements within content, more relevant programming schedules, enhanced insights atop campaign reports, even upscaled creative assets.” Yet, even with these advancements, the fundamental issue remains: the CTV interface isn’t conducive to seamless shopping. Advertisers are left investing in a feature that, despite its high hopes, hasn’t convinced the average viewer to ditch their preferred shopping devices. Until the user experience is dramatically improved, shoppable
CTV ads are likely to remain a niche curiosity rather than the next big thing in advertising. AI-Powered Brand Placement: The Awkward Cameo No One Asked ForAI-powered brand placement was sold as a groundbreaking tool that would seamlessly insert brands directly into the content you love—blending logos, products, and billboards into the very scenes of your favorite shows without the need for traditional ad breaks. The vision? A fully integrated brand
experience where ads would feel as natural as the storyline itself. Take, for instance, Rembrand’s Generative Fusion™ technology, which aimed to embed branded elements into post-production, letting characters casually sip from a strategically placed soda can or walk by a logo-embellished billboard, supposedly without pulling the viewer out of the narrative. Sounds futuristic, right? Well, not quite. In reality, these placements often stick out like a bad CGI effect
from a B-list movie. Instead of enhancing the content, these awkward insertions end up drawing attention to themselves, breaking immersion rather than adding to it. You might be watching a dramatic scene, but when an out-of-place product appears, it’s like getting hit over the head with a brand. Suddenly, the emotional moment between two characters is hijacked by a poorly rendered energy drink can that feels jarringly forced. Instead of seamless integration, these placements often feel like a
desperate attempt to gain visibility, which ironically does more harm than good by reminding the viewer of the artificiality of the experience. Jason Fairchild, CEO of TvScientific, hits the nail on the head: “AI is being used like magic fairy dust by most companies.” But he’s optimistic about true AI innovations: “Real AI is magic and will be transformative to most business categories.” TvScientific focuses on two main areas: - Campaign
Optimization: Using AI to drive advertiser-declared outcomes like ROAS, CPA, and CPI by automating campaign adjustments based on a vast array of data points.
- Creative Optimization: Building and optimizing TV ad creatives at the element level, determining which ad variations perform best with specific audience segments.
Fairchild believes these areas will unlock AI’s true potential, allowing for more precise and effective
advertising strategies that go beyond the superficial buzzwords. However, until AI can master the art of narrative integration—understanding the tone of a scene, the motivations of characters, and how to place a brand within that environment without breaking the fourth wall—AI-powered brand placement is going to remain an awkward gimmick, not the seamless advertising revolution we were promised. Who’s Actually Delivering? A Few Shining StarsAmidst the sea
of overhyped AI tools, a few companies are actually making meaningful strides: - Origin’s Slingshot: Using AI to optimize ad delivery timing, Slingshot boosts viewer retention and ad effectiveness by aligning ads more closely with how people actually watch CTV.
- KERV Interactive: Pioneering shoppable CTV ads, KERV adds interactive elements that allow viewers to explore products in real-time, though the remote-based interface remains a
hurdle.
- Vizio’s Inscape: Leveraging real-time viewing data, Inscape offers granular insights that help advertisers optimize placements based on actual viewer behavior, rather than guessing from broad demographics.
- The Trade Desk’s Koa: Analyzing millions of data points, Koa enhances campaign effectiveness and audience reach across multiple devices, providing a more accurate targeting mechanism.
- Comcast’s FreeWheel:
Integrating AI into programmatic buying, FreeWheel optimizes ad placements by finding premium inventory that aligns with real-time viewership trends.
The Real Magicians: Jason Fairchild and Jason Fairchild of TvScientificJason Fairchild, CEO of TvScientific, points out the real magic lies in AI’s ability to automate and optimize vitally important components of advertising. “AI is being used like magic fairy dust by most companies,” Fairchild notes.
But he’s optimistic about true AI innovations: “Real AI is magic and will be transformative to most business categories.” TvScientific focuses on two main areas: Campaign Optimization: Using AI to drive advertiser-declared outcomes like ROAS, CPA, and CPI by automating campaign adjustments based on a vast array of data points. This is a great use of ML/AI technology because machines can handle a LOT more variables than humans can, and there are a
LOT of variables that go into driving/optimizing sales from TV ads. Creative Optimization: Building and optimizing TV ad creatives at the element level to achieve advertiser-declared outcomes. So, for a certain audience targeting package, does the ad with the male actor with sunglasses and a red shirt perform better than a male actor in a green shirt with no sunglasses? Fairchild sees this element-level creative optimization as the killer app of AI
in TV ads. As AI continues to evolve, he believes it will take over 100% of video ad creative development, unlocking unprecedented levels of Andrew King: Cutting Through the Noise
Andrew King, GM and Product Lead at TripleLift, shares a similar skepticism but with a glimmer of hope: “AI in CTV is indeed real, but cutting through the noise is a challenge because it’s still very early.” King highlights that much of what’s being marketed as AI is merely a rebrand of existing machine learning capabilities. The next wave, particularly generative models and large language models (LLMs), are still in the
experimental phase, but early results are promising, albeit subtle. “We’re already witnessing applications—smarter ad placements within content, more relevant programming schedules, enhanced insights atop campaign reports, even upscaled creative assets,” he says. These early wins hint at a future where AI can truly enhance CTV advertising, but for now, it’s more of a cautious dance around the potential rather than a full-on revolution. The Future: Efficiency Over Revolution (For
Now)Yan Liu sums it up best: “AI is more about efficiency at this point, especially on some tasks you typically outsource.” AI in CTV is great for automating repetitive, data-heavy tasks, but it’s not yet the creative powerhouse it was touted to be. As Liu puts it, “AI will create more spam, MFA websites, and better creative for DR ads. AI is not good at linking multiple tasks yet. So I don't think it can add tons to quality of execution or creative.” Meanwhile, Jason Fairchild of TvScientific argues that real AI can revolutionize CTV by optimizing campaigns and creatives in ways humans simply can’t manage. “We think about AI/ML in terms of automating vitally important components of our business, which is leveraging TV advertising to drive actual business outcomes for advertisers,” he explains. His company has developed patented technology that optimizes campaigns and creatives to achieve advertiser-declared outcomes,
proving that AI can indeed be transformative when applied correctly. Final Thoughts: The Emperor’s New AlgorithmsSo, where does that leave us? AI in CTV is still wearing the emperor’s new clothes—glamorous on the surface but lacking real substance underneath. While companies like Origin, KERV Interactive, Vizio’s Inscape, The Trade Desk, and FreeWheel are making genuine progress, the majority of AI applications in CTV remain more smoke and mirrors than
actual game-changers. The real magic, as Jason Fairchild suggests, lies in AI’s ability to handle vast data and optimize campaigns beyond human capacity, but this potential is yet to be fully realized. For marketers, the advice is clear: approach AI in CTV with a healthy dose of skepticism. Don’t buy into the hype without seeing real results. Focus on leveraging AI where it truly adds value—efficiency, data analytics, and strategic optimization—while keeping your
expectations grounded. Until AI can seamlessly blend into the creative process and deliver on its grand promises, it’s best to view it as a powerful tool rather than the wizard behind the curtain. So, until AI in CTV can truly read the room and craft ad experiences that feel as natural as a plot twist, it remains more of an overhyped feature than the transformative force it was sold to be. Until then, marketers would do well to focus on the tangible benefits and
let the AI-driven fairy dust settle before placing their bets on the next big thing.
DISCUSS THIS ON LINKEDIN NOW
|
THREE STORIES THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW in a format that isn't TL:DR summarized for the busy executive
In the latest plot twist in tech's unsavory data grab drama, LinkedIn and Meta are under fire for allegedly playing digital Peeping Toms on healthcare websites. Two lawsuits from Brooklyn’s “V.R.” and California’s “J.S.” accuse the companies of tracking private visits to CityMD and Spring Fertility, respectively, via sneaky analytics tags, with LinkedIn’s Insight Tag and Meta’s Pixel accused of sharing visitors' personal data like it’s their own little ad playground. This
isn’t just a casual scroll-through-your-search history—it’s tracking deeply personal medical info, which plaintiffs argue is protected under California's wiretap law. LinkedIn insists the lawsuits are baseless, claiming they simply provide the analytics tools, not read private messages like a nosy neighbor. Meanwhile, U.S. courts are split on the legality, with some judges supporting consumer privacy while others give tech giants a pass. In any case, LinkedIn and Meta may want to brush up on
boundaries if they hope to avoid more courtroom drama. The Trade Desk just got a reality check from New Street Research, which downgraded the ad tech star from "neutral" to "sell," despite leaving the target price steady at $86. New Street's Dan Salmon still thinks The Trade Desk is the crème de la crème in ad tech, expecting strong earnings this quarter and a political ad cash windfall in Q4. But the buzzkill? The 2025 outlook.
Valuations are sky-high—about 50 times the EV/EBITDA ratio—and without election dollars rolling in, next year could be a slog. Despite a slight dip from its $120 high, The Trade Desk's market cap still dwarfs traditional ad giants like Omnicom and Publicis. WPP’s Q3 earnings report suggests it’s back in the game—if not as a full-fledged comeback, then at least a solid rebound. With overall revenue up 1.4% and
like-for-like revenue growth at 4.1%, WPP’s Q3 outpaced the stagnant performance from the year’s first half. Big wins with Amazon, Unilever, and Henkel, plus a fresh Starbucks deal, show that WPP’s new business drive isn’t just hype. CEO Mark Read credits the comeback to competitive offerings and a realigned agency structure, bolstered by increased adoption of their AI-powered Open marketing system. Still, even with tech stabilization and solid growth from GroupM, a soft outlook for full-year
revenue suggests economic jitters are keeping expectations low. Despite all the cheerleading, WPP’s full-year forecast stays at “flat to down 1%”—proof that while winning accounts is great, it’s the bottom line that counts. The ANA’s latest report is giving brands a clear path out of the Made-for-Advertising (MFA) maze, showing that any brand can dramatically reduce MFA exposure if it’s willing to play ball. By
following the ANA’s "anti-MFA playbook," brands like Discover slashed MFA spending down to just 1% of their programmatic budgets—a far cry from the alarming 15% industry average found last year. The ANA recommends brands buy from fewer sites, use carefully curated inclusion lists, limit SSP integrations, and dig into log-level data for transparency. Discover's overhaul, which saw it cut site partners by nearly 80% and SSPs from 19 to 11, isn’t just boosting ad quality; it's also lowering the
brand’s carbon footprint. The key takeaway? Brands that tighten up their media-buying and partner contracts can avoid wasting ad dollars on low-quality MFA placements and reclaim some control from the algorithm-driven chaos.
You're looking for an edge in your online marketing. ADOTAT.com is the answer. Our library of resources has been compiled by some of the world's top internet marketing experts, and it's constantly updated with new information, case studies, and
strategies. We want to help you succeed online - that's why we offer this information for free. It's our way of giving back to the community and helping people achieve their business goals.
Sign up now and gain access to our entire library of
resources!
Want to advertise? Contact pesach@adotat.com |
|
|
The most POWERFUL name in
CIPA AI class action defense and counseling |
ID5: The Little Identity Solution That Couldn’t” – Why $20 Million Can’t Buy You Friends (or Profit) Alright, let’s unpack the saga of ID5, the ad-tech “identity solution” that was supposed to be the cookieless messiah but
is now starting to look more like a cautionary tale in venture capital optimism. Despite raising $20 million in Series B to roll out its identifiers from web to mobile apps and even connected TV, ID5 is struggling to find its feet, much less turn a profit. Meanwhile, competitors like Lotame’s Panorama ID and The Trade Desk’s UID 2.0 have lapped them in adoption. It’s the ad-tech equivalent of entering a bicycle in the Grand Prix: technically in the race, but really just in the way. READ MORE NOW
Laurel Rossi on Marketing’s Shiny Distractions, Linear TV’s Last Gasp, and Why the Industry’s All Bark and No Bite Let’s be clear: Laurel Rossi isn’t here to join the echo chamber of ad executives talking
about “disruption” while sipping their third champagne at Cannes. No, Rossi, who juggles the roles of Chief Marketing Officer and Chief Revenue Officer at Infillion, is here to strip marketing down to its bare bones—and she’s not interested in sugarcoating it. For Rossi, marketing isn’t about joining another panel to talk in circles; it’s about real impact, measurable outcomes, and finally letting go of the industry’s obsession with buzzwords that belong in 2010. READ MORE
Why Jonah Goodhart Thinks Your Feelings Matter More Than Clicks Let me paint you a picture: I’m sitting across from Jonah Goodhart—yes, that Jonah Goodhart. The ad tech wunderkind who co -founded Moat, sold it to Oracle for a king’s
ransom, and then had the audacity to not sail off into the sunset. Instead, he’s back at it with Montauk Labs, tinkering away like some mad scientist who refuses to leave well enough alone. We’re supposed to be discussing his latest venture, but naturally, the conversation spirals into a kaleidoscope of topics—from cosmic accidents to the emotional underpinnings of insurance ads. And honestly, it’s a breath of fresh air in an industry suffocating under its
own self -importance. READ MORE
Why Your Brand Feels Like a Cheap Date: All Flash, No Substance in the World of Performance Marketing Performance marketing has become the fast-food option of the digital age—convenient, tempting, and delivering
instant satisfaction. However, just like a diet of burgers and fries, the long-term consequences are far from healthy. The race to capture clicks and conversions is wreaking havoc on brands, chipping away at long-term value while feeding a culture of immediate gratification. It’s clear that while performance marketing can offer quick wins, it’s the slow-burn of brand marketing that builds empires. READ THIS STORY NOW
The Art of Empowerment: Stacy Bohrer’s Blueprint for a Better Ad Ecosystem Stacy Bohrer, the VP of Buyer Development at OpenX, is a force of nature in the adtech realm, and if you’re not paying attention, you might just miss the whirlwind that
is her career. With more than two decades of experience stretching across the media landscape—radio, print, TV, and digital—Stacy is no stranger to navigating the chaotic waters of advertising. She’s got the wisdom of an industry veteran and the energy of someone just getting started, making her a remarkable leader in the digital advertising space. READ THE ARTICLE NOW
AdTech’s Conductor of Chaos: How Dave Morgan Sees Through the Industry’s Smoke and Mirrors Alright, everyone, hold onto your overpriced coffee cups because today we’re diving deep into the psyche of one of ad tech’s OG
disruptors—Dave Morgan. You know, the guy who’s been playing 4D chess in TV advertising while the rest of you are still trying to figure out how to beat the algorithm on TikTok. Morgan, for those of you who’ve been living under a pile of discarded NFTs, is the Chairman and Founder of Simulmedia—an outfit that’s redefining how TV advertising works. READ THE ARTICLE
Anthony Katsur: The Man, the Myth, the Cookie-Crushing, CTV-Wrangling Legend. If there’s one person who could navigate the mind-numbing intricacies of the digital ad ecosystem and still walk away with a smirk, it’s Anthony Katsur. I really like
this guy. As the CEO of IAB Tech Lab, Katsur doesn’t just know where the proverbial bodies are buried in the industry—he probably had a hand in digging a few of those graves. We’ve had him on The ADOTAT Show before, and it’s no surprise we had to bring him back for more, because when someone’s juggling privacy standards, cookie apocalypses, and CTV chaos, there’s always a fresh fire to put out or a new digital labyrinth to untangle. READ THE ENTIRE STORY
If you’re tired of KPIs that seem to mean everything but actually mean nothing, this one’s for you. Elizabeth Johnson is the leader who’s not just playing the marketing game; she’s flipping the whole board, and no one’s walking away unscathed. Buckle up and get ready to rethink everything you thought you knew about metrics,
because Johnson’s about to set the room on fire—and this time, it’s a controlled burn. READ THE FULL ARTICLE
The Trade Desk is doing a masterclass in the fine art of playing dumb, denying they're building a TV OS like a kid with crumbs all over his face denying he touched the cookie jar. But insiders—and I’m talking the ones who actually know a thing or two—say otherwise. TTD has been secretly crafting their own smart TV OS since 2019, calling it "Project Bridgewater," and teaming up with none other than Sonos
to make this dream a reality. READ THIS ARTICLE
|
|