Curation: Audigent’s Sale to Experian
and the Latest Ad Tech Shell Game
From Curation to Consolidation: The Audigent Sale and Its Ripple Effect
Ad tech’s latest buzzword isn’t AI or blockchain — it’s curation. The term is having its 15 minutes of fame, thanks to Experian snapping up Audigent, a deal that’s as much about data dominance as it is about slapping a shiny veneer on ad inventory. But let’s not
kid ourselves: this isn’t exactly a renaissance moment. It’s more like rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship — but hey, at least the chairs are now “curated.”
Curation: What Is It Really?
Curation is the art of taking the wild, unkempt jungle of programmatic ad impressions and giving it a makeover. Picture a chaotic flea market where someone swoops in, cherry-picks the least
offensive knickknacks, and slaps on a price tag that screams “luxury.” At its best, curation is a clever hack to pair advertisers with overlooked, undervalued inventory. At its worst? It’s a rebranding exercise — tap water dressed up as premium spring water because someone poured it into a crystal decanter.
For years, DSPs have been the gatekeepers of audience targeting, helping advertisers refine their reach like precision-guided missiles. But curation takes that playbook and scribbles all over it. Instead of DSPs doing the picking, curation shifts the game to the sell-side.
It’s as if SSPs suddenly stood up, slammed their beers on the table, and announced, “We’ve got this.” They bundle inventory with all the charm of a used car salesman waxing a jalopy, except now they’re fishing through the entire bidstream — that endless river of auction data DSPs can only dabble in.
So, is it targeting? Technically, yes, but with a turbocharged edge. It’s sell-side targeting with the volume cranked up to 11, promising a level of scale and precision that DSPs can’t afford to touch.
The curation players, of course: Audigent,
Multilocal, and their ilk. These companies fancy themselves as the sommeliers of ad tech, blending audience data, contextual insights, and a sprinkle of supply chain integrity into deal IDs. But before you toast to their brilliance, let’s get real. These aren’t mystical alchemists turning base impressions into gold. They’re middlemen, some genuinely adding value by filtering out garbage, and others just spray-painting junk inventory gold and hoping no one notices
Can’t SSPs do all this themselves? Well, yes — and no. SSPs are the grunt workers of the ad tech ecosystem, built to manage auctions and deliver ads, not to dazzle marketers with curated packages. Curation specialists, on the other hand, are like PR consultants for inventory, spinning a narrative and tacking on
extras to make their bundles stand out. They’re not here to replace SSPs; they’re here to coexist, weaving themselves into the process and, unsurprisingly, adding another layer of fees for their trouble.
In short, curation isn’t about reinventing the wheel. It’s about rebranding it,
putting on some shiny hubcaps, and convincing everyone it’s a luxury ride. Whether that’s value-added brilliance or just another fee-hungry middle layer depends on who’s selling — and who’s buying.
The Experian-Audigent Marriage: What’s the Deal?
Experian, the seasoned titan of data, has been dining out on its insights for decades, turning raw consumer info into gold-plated revenue
streams. But with the Audigent acquisition, Experian isn’t just playing the same old game — it’s rewriting the rules. This isn’t just about having the data anymore; it’s about owning the tools to transform it into curated packages that advertisers can’t resist. Think of it as upgrading from a clunky food processor to a sleek Michelin-star kitchen. Now Experian doesn’t just bake the bread; it owns the bakery, the mill, and maybe even the wheat fields.
It’s a strategic power play that signals a shift in ad tech’s pecking order. Consolidation is the name of the game, and companies like Experian are no longer content to partner with innovators — they want to be the innovators. Buying Audigent gives them the tech muscle to not only curate supply but also control how that supply
gets monetized. It’s like slapping a turbocharger on a car that was already winning the race.
Expect more deals like this as the industry wakes up to the reality that outsourcing innovation to third parties is a losing strategy in the long run. The future belongs to those who own both
the data and the tools to wield it, and Experian just took a giant step toward ensuring it’s not left behind in the dust. Meanwhile, the rest of the players better start figuring out whether they’re in the business of curating — or just getting curated.
Is This the Future or Just a Fad?
Curation is the ad tech darling du jour, basking in the glow of buzzwords and VC-backed press releases. But don’t pop the champagne just yet — the hype train has a tendency to derail. For every Audigent legitimately sifting gold out of the programmatic landfill, there’s another so-called curator selling you the digital equivalent of mystery meat. Slap on a shiny label that says "premium inventory" and hope nobody notices it
still smells suspiciously like a junior high lunchroom burrito. (unless you went to public school in arizona, you may not get this)
Here’s the brutal truth: curation is not some magical wand that turns lead into gold. The industry loves to wax poetic about how it guarantees better
quality, better performance, and better ROI, but let’s call a spade a spade — it’s a gamble. Marketers often don’t even know what they’re bidding on until the campaign’s already run its course, and by then, the money’s spent, the impressions are wasted, and the only thing left is an inbox full of awkward questions from your boss. Refunds? Forget it. This is ad tech, not Nordstrom’s.
And the pitfalls don’t stop there. Curation opens the door to redundancy and, worse, outright fraud. Imagine paying twice for the same audience because multiple curators “curated” it from the same polluted bidstream. It’s like paying for front-row tickets to a concert, only to realize the seats are behind a pillar, and you’ve been charged a convenience fee for the privilege of
squinting at a big screen.
Why It Matters
This isn’t just another passing fad like blockchain-for-ad-tech or the countless AI tools that promised to revolutionize the industry and then quietly disappeared. Curation has real potential to shake up the ecosystem, and not just by adding another layer of fees. By shifting targeting from the demand-side to
the sell-side, curation undermines the DSP’s historic role as the indispensable middleman. If curators can actually deliver on their promises — a big “if” — marketers might start to wonder why they’re paying a DSP to do what the sell-side is already doing better.
But let’s not get ahead
of ourselves. DSPs aren’t sweating bullets just yet. Their grip on the programmatic ecosystem is still strong, and their tools for buying and optimizing inventory are deeply entrenched in marketers’ workflows. However, curation is chipping away at the edges, and that’s how revolutions start. It’s death by a thousand curated cuts.
The power dynamic in ad tech is shifting, slowly but surely.
Marketers are fed up with bloated tech stacks, shady supply chains, and unclear performance metrics. They’re demanding transparency, accountability, and results — three things DSPs have historically struggled to deliver. If curation specialists can step up and prove they’re more than just middlemen in fancy suits, the balance of power might start tilting toward the sell-side.
But let’s not sugarcoat it: curation is no silver bullet. For every marketer who benefits from better-targeted inventory, there will be another stuck with subpar impressions and a hefty bill. The question isn’t whether curation will stick around — it will. The question is whether it will live up to its potential or just become another cog in ad tech’s already bloated machinery.
If DSPs aren’t worried yet, maybe they should be. Because if the sell-side learns to do what DSPs do, but better and cheaper, then the middlemen of programmatic advertising might find themselves on the wrong side of the innovation curve. And in ad tech, irrelevance comes faster than a CPM
auction at peak hour.
The Bottom Line
Curation is the new shiny object in ad tech, with everyone from Experian to GroupM pinning their hopes on its promises of streamlined efficiency and better margins. In a sector drowning in jargon and bloated tech stacks, it’s tempting to crown curation the savior of programmatic advertising. But let’s not pop the confetti cannons just yet — there’s
no magical fountain of fresh inventory being discovered here. The same impressions that have been floating around the programmatic swamp are now getting a facelift and a fancy “curated” tag slapped on them. Spoiler: it’s still the same swamp.
Display advertising? It’s not just dying;
it’s practically in hospice. And the so-called curated solutions being pitched today are often just the same old junk dressed up in a sharp suit, ready to charm marketers with buzzwords and inflated promises. It’s like rebranding leftovers as a gourmet meal — sure, it might taste fine once, but it’s not a sustainable feast.
The question isn’t whether curation will have staying power; it’s already entrenched enough that it’s not going anywhere. The real question is whether it will deliver on its lofty promises or fade into the background as just another ad tech buzzword that came, saw, and added a few more fees to the supply chain.
What’s certain is that not everyone will emerge unscathed. When the dust settles, someone’s going to be left holding the bill for this so-called innovation. And if history is any guide, it won’t be the curators. They’ll have moved on to the next big thing, leaving marketers and publishers to sort through the wreckage — and pay for it. Meanwhile, the rest of us will be left wondering if “curated” was just code for “same old crap,
but more expensive.”
CHAT ABOUT THIS ON
LINKEDIN
