Let’s paint the picture: Nielsen, the ratings behemoth that’s ruled over media measurement since the days when TVs had rabbit ears, is trying hard to stay relevant in a world that’s essentially left it in the dust. For decades, Nielsen data has been the North Star for advertisers, guiding billions in ad spend with its traditional, panel-based measurement system. But in the age of fragmented audiences, where folks watch
on everything from smart fridges to smartwatches, advertisers are starting to wonder if maybe, just maybe, it’s time to find a new star.
Enter Advertiser Perceptions, which recently asked advertisers where their loyalties lie. The results? Not exactly the love letter Nielsen might have hoped for. A whole 60% of advertisers confessed to playing the field, trying alternative measurement services over the last year. That’s a whopping majority of folks who once trusted
Nielsen’s word as gospel, now saying, “You know, we’re looking for something a little fresher.” Almost half of them reported these new metrics work just as well as Nielsen, while 36% had the audacity to claim these rivals were doing a better job.
So Nielsen’s not the only show in town anymore. VideoAmp, iSpot.tv, Comscore—they’re all muscling in on the measurement space, offering advertisers fresh options to track audiences across platforms. Paramount, one of
Nielsen’s former biggest fans, has openly jumped ship, moving to VideoAmp and warning Nielsen it might be a permanent breakup. When asked why they’re ghosting Nielsen, the networks pretty much say that Nielsen just isn’t keeping up. And you can hardly blame them: viewers have migrated to streaming en masse, yet Nielsen’s been dragging its feet when it comes to measuring anything that’s not on a traditional TV set.
In a desperate bid to prove it’s still got the
goods, Nielsen recently rolled out what it’s calling a game-changer: first-party live-streaming data, now officially blessed by the Media Rating Council (MRC). Nielsen’s spin? This integration supposedly makes it “the first accredited live-streaming solution with persons-level granularity.” That’s right, folks: Nielsen wants credit for finally acknowledging that people are watching TV on more than just TVs. CEO Karthik Rao spun it as “a great affirmation of Nielsen’s ability to innovate,” saying
that Nielsen’s data now represents “the convergence of all the ways people watch content.” Translation? Nielsen’s scrambling to stay relevant in a world that’s watching everything everywhere all at once.
But let’s not get carried away. While Rao may be crowing about MRC’s renewed accreditation, there’s a fair share of industry folks who aren’t exactly impressed. Some insiders at MRC’s TV Committee reportedly didn’t think Nielsen’s first-party streaming data was
ready for prime time, arguing that it might give an unfair advantage to the major digital platforms like Amazon, Netflix, and Disney+. Why? Because those streaming giants have the infrastructure and data to stack the deck, while smaller networks are left out in the cold. This isn’t just a tech update; it’s a potential shift in the balance of media power. Smaller networks like Fox, which doesn’t even stream its big Sunday NFL games, could be at a disadvantage if Nielsen starts favoring platforms
with robust streaming numbers.
Paramount, for one, isn’t buying into Nielsen’s hype. The media giant has been in a contract standoff with Nielsen over pricing and, for now, has chosen to rely on VideoAmp instead. They aren’t the only ones. Warner Bros. Discovery and NBCUniversal are testing new alliances with Nielsen’s rivals, and even CBS, another longtime Nielsen stalwart, has started putting its chips on VideoAmp. That’s three of the biggest players in TV openly
exploring other options. And it’s no secret why: these networks are sick of relying on a single, lumbering entity that can’t seem to keep up with how people actually watch content.
During the pandemic, Nielsen had an embarrassing stumble, undercounting audiences because it couldn’t adapt fast enough to lockdown viewing habits. The MRC took away its accreditation at the time, a pretty public slap on the wrist that had the industry buzzing. Since then, Nielsen’s
tried to reestablish itself as the gold standard in media measurement, but these latest moves have left networks wondering if Nielsen’s just dusting off old tools for a new problem. Because let’s be real—Nielsen’s entire model was built on the assumption that people would keep watching TV in a specific way, on a specific device, at a specific time. The new reality, where content is streamed across ten screens and watched whenever people feel like it, is a little more complicated.
Even Madison Avenue, which has historically treated Nielsen’s numbers like holy writ, is starting to look elsewhere. For decades, big brands and advertisers had no choice but to trust Nielsen, because the alternatives were few and far between. But with a growing roster of companies like VideoAmp, Comscore, and iSpot.tv proving their mettle, agencies are starting to reconsider who they trust with their ad dollars. These upstart firms are pitching themselves as more agile,
more accurate, and more aligned with the realities of today’s media landscape. And given the way Nielsen’s clung to its old-school methods, they’re finding plenty of receptive ears.
Let’s talk about this “first-party data” a little more. The concept sounds harmless enough—who wouldn’t want data straight from the source? But in practice, it’s a setup that benefits big players who already have massive datasets at their disposal. Companies like Amazon, with its Prime
Video numbers and “Thursday Night Football” streams, stand to gain a lot from this new arrangement. By letting these platforms incorporate their own data into Nielsen’s system, we could be entering a new age where the richest players—those who can afford to compile endless data about their viewers—have a competitive edge in the ratings game.
But it’s a slippery slope. What happens when smaller networks can’t compete because they don’t have the same data firepower?
Does Nielsen’s new model start to push everyone who isn’t a major streaming platform to the sidelines? As streaming becomes the norm and traditional linear TV continues to decline, the rules of engagement in media measurement are changing fast, and Nielsen is trying to play catch-up with companies that started tracking streaming data ages ago.
The future of media measurement is suddenly up for grabs, and Nielsen’s grip on the industry is weaker than ever. The firm
has campaigned tirelessly to get MRC’s blessing for its new tools, even securing Amazon’s endorsement along the way. Amazon, for its part, has been vocal about its belief that Nielsen’s old metrics didn’t do justice to the hordes tuning into “Thursday Night Football” on Prime. And even the NFL has weighed in, with data chief Paul Ballew calling for a shift to first-party data across all rights holders to better capture what today’s viewers are really watching.
So,
here we are: Nielsen’s MRC-backed attempt at reinvention might buy it some goodwill with the old guard, but the cracks are showing, and advertisers are taking notice. For the first time, networks have legitimate alternatives in VideoAmp, Comscore, and iSpot.tv—options that could break Nielsen’s monopoly on ratings. The big question now is whether Nielsen can keep pace with the industry it once defined or whether it’ll be remembered as the measuring stick that refused to evolve.
This isn’t just about Nielsen; it’s about an entire industry that’s rethinking what it values in measurement. Nielsen’s new “convergence” pitch might sound impressive, but as networks keep jumping ship and advertisers hedge their bets, it’s clear that Nielsen’s future isn’t guaranteed. The throne isn’t vacant yet, but if Nielsen can’t prove it’s as dynamic and forward-thinking as its younger competitors, the crown might just end up on someone else’s head.
DISCUSS THIS ON
LINKEDIN NOW
