🎬 Ready to turn your TV ads into showstoppers? Origin's zero-code CTV solutions are here to rescue your marketing campaigns from the abyss of mediocrity. With our award-winning creative tech, you'll captivate audiences both in the living room and on-the-go. We blend cutting-edge ad formats with direct media partnerships to ensure your brand doesn't just get seen – it gets remembered. Think agile
storytelling, dynamic creatives, and unparalleled attention metrics. Join the ranks of savvy marketers who trust Origin to elevate their advertising game. Dive into the future of CTV with Origin – where attention isn't just grabbed, it's held hostage. :LEARN MORE
Breaking Up Google: A Tech Fantasy or the DOJ’s Next Move?
The Justice Department is circling Google like a shark that just caught the scent of blood. After years of letting Silicon Valley’s golden child run amok, the feds are finally sharpening their knives, and this time, they might just be serious. The question on everyone’s mind: Will Google, the tech giant that practically wrote the book on modern digital dominance, be the latest Goliath to face the slingshot of antitrust
justice? Let’s get one thing straight—Google is no ordinary company. It’s the kind of corporate beast that doesn’t just dominate markets; it redefines them. From search to video, mobile operating systems to advertising, Google’s tentacles reach into just about every corner of the internet. And now, the Justice Department is considering some of its boldest moves yet: splitting off Chrome, cutting out Android, or forcing Google
to share its closely guarded data with competitors. It’s like trying to peel layers off an onion without making everyone cry. But before you get too excited about the prospect of Google’s impending demise, let’s take a reality check. As much as we’d all love a David-and-Goliath moment, breaking up Google isn’t exactly like putting Humpty Dumpty back together again. Terrence Kawaja, the CEO of LUMA Partners, who has navigated
the choppy waters of tech mergers and acquisitions for years, recently pointed out that while the DOJ may have won a significant legal victory, it’s far from clear that Google is on the losing side. Kawaja stated, “It’s a big victory for [the DOJ]. It’ll be appealed. We’ll see the eventual outcome. But it is a victory for the DOJ, but it’s not a loss for Google.” Here’s the thing: Even if the DOJ manages to land a punch, it’s
not clear that it’ll hurt Google where it counts. Fines? Please. Google has more cash on hand than some small countries’ GDPs. Kawaja emphasized that “Fines are nothing because we don’t have legislation that gets fines anywhere in a range that Google would care about.” He’s spot on. Even a billion-dollar fine would be a rounding error for a company like Google. So, what about breaking up the company? That’s where things get
sticky. Google didn’t just buy its way to the top; it built its empire from the ground up, starting with the PageRank algorithm that made it the king of search. Unlike some other tech giants, Google’s dominance isn’t the result of gobbling up competitors—it’s the product of relentless innovation and, yes, a healthy dose of market savvy. According to Kawaja, forced divestiture is unlikely because “Google did not acquire anything to drive its search business.” He highlights the unprecedented
nature of trying to make a company divest from a business it didn’t acquire but built organically. The most realistic option on the table seems to be targeting Google’s distribution deals—the very deals that made sure its search engine was the default on every iPhone and every Android device under the sun. Kawaja pointed out that these deals are central to the DOJ’s case, with the judge indicating that they may have been
anti-competitive. If the government can nix those deals, it could theoretically level the playing field. But here’s the catch: even if they do, don’t expect Google’s market share to nosedive overnight. As Kawaja noted, “People are going to, if given the choice, now when you open your Apple phone and it says, ‘Would you like to choose Bing or DuckDuckGo or Google or Yahoo?’ Yeah, people are going to choose Google.” But let’s be
real, the DOJ isn’t just giving Google a side-eye over its search dominance—they’ve got their binoculars out, zoomed in on the company’s growing power in artificial intelligence. And why wouldn’t they? Google’s been amassing data like a dragon hoarding gold, and now, with AI, they’ve got the chance to do what they do best: use that treasure trove of information to outmaneuver everyone else. The concern here is that Google could pull the same tricks in AI that it mastered in search—cornering the
market before anyone else even knows there’s a game on. Think about it: Google’s AI is already leaps and bounds ahead, not just because they’ve got the brainpower (which they do, in spades) but because they’ve got data—mountains of it. This data gives Google’s AI a head start that’s not just unfair; it’s practically insurmountable for the competition. The government’s solution? Force Google to share its data with rivals. It’s like telling a poker player to lay all
their cards on the table while everyone else gets a fresh hand. Sure, it might level the playing field in the short term, but it also threatens to turn the entire market into a kind of digital socialism, where everyone gets a taste, but no one really wins big. This move could reshape the tech landscape in ways we haven’t even begun to imagine. On the one hand, it could democratize AI development, giving smaller players a shot at building something that could rival
Google’s creations. But on the flip side, it could also stifle innovation. If every company has access to the same data, where’s the incentive to push the boundaries? We could end up with a market where everyone is creating slightly different versions of the same thing, and that’s not exactly the recipe for groundbreaking advancements. Plus, let’s not forget the logistical nightmare of enforcing such a data-sharing mandate. How do you ensure Google is handing over all the right data, in the
right way, and not keeping the juiciest bits for itself? It’s a bold idea, but the execution could be a mess—one that leaves the market fragmented and innovation stifled, all in the name of fairness. Let’s talk about YouTube, the big, shiny, elephant
in the room that everyone seems to be tiptoeing around. With a staggering $31 billion in advertising revenue last year, YouTube isn’t just some side project for Google—it’s a behemoth in its own right, a platform that could easily stand alone as one of the largest media companies in the world. Yet, when it comes to the antitrust chatter swirling around Google, YouTube is conspicuously absent from the conversation. How does a platform with more eyeballs than most countries have people escape the
scrutiny of regulators who are otherwise chomping at the bit to dismantle Google’s empire? It’s a curious omission, to say the least. One possible explanation is that the government simply has bigger fish to fry, at least for now. The DOJ is laser-focused on Google’s search dominance and the alleged anti-competitive practices that have kept its grip on the market ironclad. In the grand scheme of things, YouTube, while massive, might be seen as a separate beast—one
that doesn’t directly contribute to the same kind of market control that the DOJ is gunning for. After all, the case against Google revolves around search and advertising practices that directly stifle competition in those specific arenas. YouTube, on the other hand, is more about content and media distribution, which, while undeniably lucrative, doesn’t quite fit the narrative the DOJ is pushing. But let’s not kid ourselves—ignoring YouTube’s role in Google’s
empire is like pretending the sun isn’t a big deal because you’re more concerned with the planets. YouTube is not just a massive revenue generator; it’s a cornerstone of Google’s data and advertising machine. It’s deeply integrated into Google’s ecosystem, collecting vast amounts of user data that feed directly into Google’s ad targeting algorithms. Pulling YouTube out of Google would be like trying to extract a vital organ without killing the patient. The platform’s content serves as a rich
data source that enhances Google’s ability to deliver hyper-targeted ads across its entire network. In other words, YouTube isn’t just a cog in the machine—it’s the oil that keeps the whole engine running smoothly. If regulators eventually decide to turn their gaze toward YouTube, they’ll be faced with the daunting task of untangling it from the rest of Google’s operations, a process that would likely be as complex as it is contentious. At the end of the day, this whole saga is shaping up to be less about breaking up Google and more about figuring out how to rein it in without blowing up the entire digital ecosystem in the process. Google isn’t just a company; it’s the backbone of the internet as we know it. Sure, it’s fun to imagine a world where Google’s monopoly is shattered, where Chrome, Android, and YouTube are set free to roam the digital landscape as independent entities.
But the reality is that even if the DOJ gets its way, the aftermath could be more of a headache than anyone’s bargaining for. In the grand scheme of things, this might just be another chapter in the endless tug-of-war between Big Tech and regulators—a game where the rules keep changing, but the players stay the same. Google isn’t going anywhere, and while the DOJ might land a few blows, don’t bet on the company getting knocked
out anytime soon. The real question isn’t whether Google will be broken up, but whether the government can figure out how to put the brakes on without crashing the whole system. And that, my friends, is a puzzle that might take more than a few court rulings to solve.
CHAT ABOUT THIS ON LINKEDIN
|
THREE STORIES THAT YOU NEED TO KNOW in a format that isn't TL:DR summarized for the busy executive
Publicis Media just scored
a $500 million touchdown by nabbing Sky’s European media account, booting out GroupM’s EssenceMediacom in the process. While Sky's keeping mum on the details, insiders say Zenith will lead the charge across multiple countries. Publicis is clearly on a hot streak, bagging big names like Rocket and Hershey’s while keeping Kellanova’s sweet gig. Looks like this summer, the only thing hotter than Publicis’ business development is the
weather. Coke Zero Sugar is gunning for Gen Z’s attention this college football season by mixing gaming with gridiron action, proving once again that the key to young hearts is through a console. Teaming up with EA Sports, Coke is bringing in-game rewards to fans who scan codes on their soda packs, blurring the lines between chugging and cheering. On-campus events and a TV campaign starring some seriously hyped fans (and a
goat) are part of the blitz. It’s a savvy play to connect with a generation that’s more into game controllers than remote controls. CTV just got a turbo boost in the targeting department with FreeWheel's integration of Proximic by Comscore’s contextual audience data, giving media buyers a sharper, privacy-compliant tool to hit their mark. Paramount’s EyeQ is the first to run with this new feature, paving the way for more publishers to follow. By leveraging non-identifier data, Proximic can predict
who’s binge-watching what and why, making it easier for brands to connect with diaper-buyers or car-intenders without jumping through multiple SSP hoops. It’s like turning your TV into a crystal ball—no creepy tracking required.
You're looking for an edge in your online marketing. ADOTAT.com is the answer. Our library of resources has been compiled by some of the world's top internet marketing experts, and it's constantly updated with new information, case studies, and
strategies.
We want to help you succeed online - that's why we offer this information for free. It's our way of giving back to the community and helping people achieve their business goals.
Sign up now and gain access to our entire library of
resources!
Want to advertise? Contact pesach@adotat.com |
|
|
The most POWERFUL name in
CIPA AI class action defense and counseling |
In this must-watch episode of The ADOTAT Show, Pesach Lattin sits down with Jon Walsh, the mastermind behind JobsinAdtech.com, to unpack over two decades of ad tech evolution. With 24 years of experience navigating the complex world of digital advertising,
WATCH THIS EPISODE.
Meet Erin Hawryluk, the VP of Marketing at Cadent. This dynamo doesn’t just navigate the chaotic world of ad tech; she bulldozes through it like a wrecking ball through a Jenga tower. Balancing career and kids with the finesse of a tightrope walker
and the fire of a dragon, Erin is a force of nature. Picture a juggler at a three-ring circus, but instead of balls, she's handling spreadsheets, data, and an endless stream of strategic meetings. She’s been through it all, from ad sales to product marketing, and has enough stories to fill a best-selling thriller—or at least a very entertaining graphic novel. READ THE FULL INTERVIEW
SPONSORED CONTENT BY ORIGIN
Feeling stuck in the car sales slow lane? It's time to shift gears and rev up your dealership’s marketing game! Discover how Connected TV (CTV)
advertising is transforming the car-buying landscape. With unpredictable inventory, inflation, and post-COVID consumer habits, selling cars is like hitting a moving target. But don’t fret! CTV offers precision targeting, hyper-local reach, and seamless cross-device campaigns. Dive into the latest trends and learn how to turn these challenges into opportunities. Your dealership’s digital evolution starts here – read on and get ahead of the curve!
READ THE ARTICLE AT ORIGIN.
Simon Halstead: AdTech’s Cake-loving Oracle
In our ever stranger industry, there’s one name that stands out like a neon sign in a dystopian cityscape: Simon Halstead. This isn’t just any strategist; he’s the guru who can decode the industry’s most cryptic secrets while
sipping a latte, all while dropping truth bombs with the precision of a master marksman. Simon Halstead is the kind of guy who, when he speaks, the room listens—and for good reason. READ THE FULL INTERVIEW
Jon Bond: The Legend Who Ditched Cookies for a Weightless World. Jon Bond isn’t just a name in advertising; it’s a blazing marquee in the hall of fame of marketing mavens. This dynamo, who forged his reputation at the helm of Kirshbaum, Bond and Partners,
is now piloting the good ship Weightless through the turbulent seas of advertising, where antiquated tactics are about as useful as a pager in the age of smartphones. With the glint of a seasoned iconoclast, Jon dishes on his latest caper, "We're steering a cookie-less AI media firm," tossing a playful jab at the industry’s old guard clinging to data-tracking cookies like a lifeline. "Picture this," he quips, "you’re entering a space race, but your competition is saddled with horse and buggies
while you’ve already launched the rocket." READ THE FULL ARTICLE
Ever heard of someone transforming from a tech-averse marketer to an AI trailblazer? Meet Naama Manova Twito, the co-founder of the world’s first fully autonomous AR marketing team. Fasten your seatbelts, folks; this isn’t your typical startup saga. We’re talking about a journey filled with kicking, screaming, and eventually hugging the tech beast. READ THE FULL STORY NOW!
Google’s latest move is a doozy. After years of waffling on third-party cookies, the tech behemoth has decided to keep the cookies. On Monday, Google announced it would no longer axe support for third-party cookies in Chrome. Instead, they’re pushing other options that supposedly give users more control over their privacy and tracking—like handing a fox the keys to the henhouse.
|
|
